Latest decision summaries

  • Date of Decision:11/20/2017 Reg.No:3283-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards Skärholmen City District Board in Stockholm municipality for handing out a certificate to a parent that the parent was going to refer to, in a passport case

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/17/2017 Reg.No:1089-2016

    Enquiry initiated by the Parliamentary Ombudsmen regarding inmates with accompanied children, as well as pregnant inmates in prison

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/15/2017 Reg.No:7750-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs severe criticism towards the Enforcement Authority for failures in the authority’s asset management

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/9/2017 Reg.No:2623-2017

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards the Social Welfare Board in Ekerö municipality for reading a report due to concern to a child in its entirety

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/9/2017 Reg.No:3522-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards the Social Welfare Board in Örkelljunga municipality for not giving out certain information to a legal representative

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/7/2017 Reg.No:2998-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards the Migration Agency for stating the wrong date of birth on a certificate for residence permit

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:10/26/2017 Reg.No:7314-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards Försäkringskassan for not informing an individual, that a decision that the individual could take part of through Försäkringskassan’s personalised webpage [Mina sidor], was an interim decision and only

    Hide information

    Summary

    By Försäkringskassan’s personalised webpage [Mina sidor] it appeared as if the authority had taken a decision on sickness benefit up to a specific date and that a renewed doctor’s certificate was required if the insured individual wished to apply for further sickness benefits. However, there was no explanation of the fact that the decision was an interim decision regarding benefits throughout the course of the investigation. In the decision, the Parliamentary Ombudsmen emphasize that information released on Försäkringskassan’s personalised webpage need to be adequately and clearly formulated. 

  • Date of Decision:10/26/2017 Reg.No:2606-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards Försäkringskassan for failures in the formation and grounds of a decision on modification and re-examination pursuant to chapter 113, section 3 and chapter 113, section 7 of the Social Insurance Code

    Read more
Search