Latest decision summaries

  • Date of Decision:11/20/2017 Reg.No:3283-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards Skärholmen City District Board in Stockholm municipality for handing out a certificate to a parent that the parent was going to refer to, in a passport case

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/17/2017 Reg.No:1089-2016

    Enquiry initiated by the Parliamentary Ombudsmen regarding inmates with accompanied children, as well as pregnant inmates in prison

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/15/2017 Reg.No:7750-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs severe criticism towards the Enforcement Authority for failures in the authority’s asset management

    Hide information

    Summary

    From December 2016 to July 2017, the Parliamentary Ombudsmen received a large amount of complaints against the Enforcement Authority. A reoccurring complaint was due to the authority’s lack of keeping records of completed payments, which had resulted in consequences for the complainants, inter alia; it led to incomplete investigations and distrains as well as delays in the authority’s repayments.

    In the authority’s referral response to the Parliamentary Ombudsmen, the Enforcement Authority admits to the failures that the complainants have observed. The authority regrets the mistakes that have occurred and the inconvenience that the deficient processing has led to. The Enforcement Authority accounts for their failures in the asset management and for several measures taken to correct these failures.

    In the decision, the Parliamentary Ombudsmen states that the authority’s management of restraints has not been in compliance to the instructions of how to administer the procedures according to the rule of law, as well as being cost efficient and done simply. The reason why these mistakes have occurred is, according to the Parliamentary Ombudsmen’s understanding, mistakes and failures in the authority’s asset management. To administer these duties according to the authority’s functions is the obligation of the senior management; the Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs severe criticism towards the Enforcement Authority.

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen will hand over a copy of this decision to the Ministry of Finance for knowledge.

  • Date of Decision:11/9/2017 Reg.No:2623-2017

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards the Social Welfare Board in Ekerö municipality for reading a report due to concern to a child in its entirety

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/9/2017 Reg.No:3522-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards the Social Welfare Board in Örkelljunga municipality for not giving out certain information to a legal representative

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/7/2017 Reg.No:2998-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards the Migration Agency for stating the wrong date of birth on a certificate for residence permit

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:10/26/2017 Reg.No:7314-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards Försäkringskassan for not informing an individual, that a decision that the individual could take part of through Försäkringskassan’s personalised webpage [Mina sidor], was an interim decision and only

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:10/26/2017 Reg.No:2606-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards Försäkringskassan for failures in the formation and grounds of a decision on modification and re-examination pursuant to chapter 113, section 3 and chapter 113, section 7 of the Social Insurance Code

    Read more
Search