Latest decision summaries

  • Date of Decision:7/27/2017 Reg.No:803-2017

    Severe criticism of Försäkringskassan for slow processing in cases on insurance affiliation and child benefits

    Hide information

    Summary

    R.S. applied for child benefits on the 4th of February 2016. On the 18th of March 2016, he also handed in information regarding the investigation of his wife M.S.’s case on insurance affiliation. Försäkringskassan did not initiate the case on insurance affiliation until four and a half month had passed. M.S. received insurance affiliation in Sweden on the 18th of August 2016 but it was not until the 6th of February 2017 that Försäkringskassan took a decision on R.S.’s case. The Parliamentary Ombudsmen notes that Försäkringskassan’s slow processing was not due to difficulties in obtaining documents from a foreign country, which the Parliamentary Ombudsmen has recognized in previous cases, but due to Försäkringskassan’s own lack of initiative.

  • Date of Decision:7/13/2017 Reg.No:2017-2015

    Criticism of the Prison and Probation Service, Södertörn Probation Authority, for the processing of a personal case study

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:7/12/2017 Reg.No:1145-2016

    Criticism of the Competition Authority for a number of failures when processing a case on the suspected abuse of a dominant position

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:6/29/2017 Reg.No:2447-2015

    Report against the Care and Nursing Administration of Karlstad Municipality that an elderly woman at a nursing home was not permitted to make video calls on her tablet in the nursing home’s common areas

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:6/22/2017 Reg.No:4945-2016

    Criticism of the Swedish Police Authority inter alia for a woman who was taken into custody for intoxication not being permitted to use the toilet during the night, and for the woman not being offered anything to cover herself with

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:6/21/2017 Reg.No:6930-2016

    Criticism of a teacher who, during an ongoing custody dispute, expressed an opinion about the other parent in an email to one of the child’s parents in a way that was not neutral

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:6/15/2017 Reg.No:6153-2016

    Severe criticism of an official at the Urban Planning Committee in the municipality of Täby for its treatment of an individual in email correspondence with that individual

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:6/15/2017 Reg.No:3197-2016

    Criticism of Hässelby-Vällingby District Council in the Municipality of Stockholm for slow processing of a request for photographs and videos

    Read more
Search