Latest decision summaries

  • Date of Decision:4/9/2020 Decision Case Number:2625-2018

    The Parliamentary Ombudsman directs criticism towards the Swedish embassy in Teheran for its processing of a case involving a Schengen visa, when the applicant claimed she was covered by the Freedom of Movement Directive

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:4/3/2020 Decision Case Number:8346-2018

    The Parliamentary Ombudsman directs criticism towards the Migration Agency for providing incorrect and misleading information on its website and in a standardised email reply

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:3/31/2020 Decision Case Number:4816-2019

    The Parliamentary Ombudsman directs severe criticism towards the Police Authority for not having complied with a decision from the National Board of Appeal

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:3/26/2020 Decision Case Number:4988-2018

    The Parliamentary Ombudsman directs criticism towards the Family Care Committee in Sigtuna municipality for inadequate processing of a case on the transfer of a child under care pursuant to the Care of Young Persons Act

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:3/26/2020 Decision Case Number:2337-2019

    The Social Welfare Board in Alingsås municipality is criticised for the fact that a unit manager at the board’s administration decided to launch investigations into the situation of two siblings despite there being subject to a conflict of interest

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:3/25/2020 Decision Case Number:4790-2019

    The Parliamentary Ombudsman directs criticism towards the Prison and Probation Service, Kumla prison, for a procedure regarding the presence of representatives during interrogations, in cases of warnings pursuant to the Prisons Act

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:3/23/2020 Decision Case Number:8479-2018

    Criticism of a police officer who failed to maintain objectivity in a telephone conversation with an individual

    Read more
Search