Latest decision summaries

  • Date of Decision:11/20/2017 Reg.No:3283-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards Skärholmen City District Board in Stockholm municipality for handing out a certificate to a parent that the parent was going to refer to, in a passport case

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/17/2017 Reg.No:1089-2016

    Enquiry initiated by the Parliamentary Ombudsmen regarding inmates with accompanied children, as well as pregnant inmates in prison

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/15/2017 Reg.No:7750-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs severe criticism towards the Enforcement Authority for failures in the authority’s asset management

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/9/2017 Reg.No:2623-2017

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards the Social Welfare Board in Ekerö municipality for reading a report due to concern to a child in its entirety

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/9/2017 Reg.No:3522-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards the Social Welfare Board in Örkelljunga municipality for not giving out certain information to a legal representative

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:11/7/2017 Reg.No:2998-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards the Migration Agency for stating the wrong date of birth on a certificate for residence permit

    Hide information

    Summary

    The complainant was provided a date of birth, other than her correct date of birth, by the Swedish Tax Agency. On the certificate that the Migration Agency issues for persons that have received a residence permit, a person’s date of birth, among other things, is included. The complainant received four certificates from the Migration Agency including the birth date the complainant received from the Swedish Tax Agency, and not her correct date of birth. The Migration Agency held that the mistakes occurred due to technical limitations in their IT system. 

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards the Migration Agency for failing in their processing of the complainant’s certificate. The Migration Agency has taken a decision on measures to avoid similar problems, the Parliamentary Ombudsmen looks positive upon this decision.

  • Date of Decision:10/26/2017 Reg.No:7314-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards Försäkringskassan for not informing an individual, that a decision that the individual could take part of through Försäkringskassan’s personalised webpage [Mina sidor], was an interim decision and only

    Read more
  • Date of Decision:10/26/2017 Reg.No:2606-2016

    The Parliamentary Ombudsmen directs criticism towards Försäkringskassan for failures in the formation and grounds of a decision on modification and re-examination pursuant to chapter 113, section 3 and chapter 113, section 7 of the Social Insurance Code

    Read more
Search