Date of decision: 2024-12-19
Decision case number: 8819-2023
New review of the Swedish Migration Agency’s processing times
Go to decision about New review of the Swedish Migration Agency’s processing times
Date of decision: 2024-12-19
Decision case number: 8164-2023
Statement on a public authority blocking a user from the authority’s account on X (formerly Twitter)
Go to decision about Statement on a public authority blocking a user from the authority’s account on X (formerly Twitter)
Date of decision: 2024-12-18
Decision case number: 4249-2024
Criticism of Region Västmanland for its processing of a request for the disclosure of official documents
Go to decision about Criticism of Region Västmanland for its processing of a request for the disclosure of official documents
Date of decision: 2024-12-16
Decision case number: 3348-2023
The Social Welfare Committee in Svedala Municipality and the SiS special residential home for young people in Eknäs are severely criticised for unlawfully providing care under the Care of Young Persons (Special Provisions) Act in a secure unit. The Administrative Court in Malmö is also sharply criticised
Go to decision about The Social Welfare Committee in Svedala Municipality and the SiS special residential home for young people in Eknäs are severely criticised for unlawfully providing care under the Care of Young Persons (Special Provisions) Act in a secure unit. The Administrative Court in Malmö is also sharply criticised
Date of decision: 2024-12-13
Decision case number: 3637-2024
Bollnäs Municipality criticised for its processing of a request for the disclosure of official documents
Go to decision about Bollnäs Municipality criticised for its processing of a request for the disclosure of official documents
Date of decision: 2024-12-12
Decision case number: 6346-2023
Severe criticism of the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, Umeå Remand Prison, for failing to ensure that an inmate received the preliminary investigation report on their case, as well as for supplying incorrect information on the matter to public defence counsel and the police
Go to decision about Severe criticism of the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, Umeå Remand Prison, for failing to ensure that an inmate received the preliminary investigation report on their case, as well as for supplying incorrect information on the matter to public defence counsel and the police
Date of decision: 2024-12-12
Decision case number: 5689-2023
Criticism of the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, Sollentuna Remand Prison, for losing a preliminary investigation report and, in another case, erasing a report from a device
Go to decision about Criticism of the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, Sollentuna Remand Prison, for losing a preliminary investigation report and, in another case, erasing a report from a device
Date of decision: 2024-12-11
Decision case number: 10090-2023
Statement on when a decision should be made in writing. Also criticism of a regional forensic psychiatric clinic for unlawfully limiting patients’ opportunities to make telephone calls
Go to decision about Statement on when a decision should be made in writing. Also criticism of a regional forensic psychiatric clinic for unlawfully limiting patients’ opportunities to make telephone calls
Date of decision: 2024-12-10
Decision case number: 9988-2023
Criticism of the Swedish Transport Agency for referring visitors to its website to an application form only available in English in breach of the Language Act
Go to decision about Criticism of the Swedish Transport Agency for referring visitors to its website to an application form only available in English in breach of the Language Act
Date of decision: 2024-12-10
Decision case number: 7382-2023
Criticism of the Swedish Migration Agency for the design of a moratorium on decisions concerning asylum applications from citizens of Ukraine, and for failing to comply with a court injunction to decide a matter without delay
Go to decision about Criticism of the Swedish Migration Agency for the design of a moratorium on decisions concerning asylum applications from citizens of Ukraine, and for failing to comply with a court injunction to decide a matter without delay
