Date of decision: 2026-04-29
Decision case number: 8518-2025
Criticism of the Swedish Police Authority for poor documentation of measures taken at border control
Go to decision about Criticism of the Swedish Police Authority for poor documentation of measures taken at border control
Date of decision: 2026-04-29
Decision case number: 8380-2024
Based on the situations of two inmates, the Parliamentary Ombudsman makes statements concerning the consideration given to inmates’ health by the Swedish Prison and Probation Service in relation to double occupancy
Go to decision about Based on the situations of two inmates, the Parliamentary Ombudsman makes statements concerning the consideration given to inmates’ health by the Swedish Prison and Probation Service in relation to double occupancy
Date of decision: 2026-04-23
Decision case number: 2088-2025
Criticism of the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, including Karlskoga Prison, for the processing of a request for a medical certificate, etc.
Go to decision about Criticism of the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, including Karlskoga Prison, for the processing of a request for a medical certificate, etc.
Date of decision: 2026-04-21
Decision case number: 14238-2025
Severe criticism of the Swedish Companies Registration Office because for many years the agency applied a procedure by which, in certain cases, applicants were instructed to pay a registration fee despite the matter in question being free of charge
Go to decision about Severe criticism of the Swedish Companies Registration Office because for many years the agency applied a procedure by which, in certain cases, applicants were instructed to pay a registration fee despite the matter in question being free of charge
Date of decision: 2026-04-17
Decision case number: 6269-2025
Criticism of the Swedish Police Authority for its passive processing of an application for a permit to organise a public gathering
Go to decision about Criticism of the Swedish Police Authority for its passive processing of an application for a permit to organise a public gathering
Date of decision: 2026-04-10
Decision case number: 8368-2024
Criticism of the Social Welfare Committee in Linköping Municipality for its processing of a case involving a girl residing in a home other than her own
Go to decision about Criticism of the Social Welfare Committee in Linköping Municipality for its processing of a case involving a girl residing in a home other than her own
Date of decision: 2026-04-09
Decision case number: 5588-2024
The Social Welfare Committee in Upplands Väsby Municipality is criticised for shortcomings in the relocation of a child in foster care pursuant to the Care of Young Persons (Special Provisions) Act
Go to decision about The Social Welfare Committee in Upplands Väsby Municipality is criticised for shortcomings in the relocation of a child in foster care pursuant to the Care of Young Persons (Special Provisions) Act
Date of decision: 2026-04-09
Decision case number: 2129-2025
Severe criticism of the Social Welfare Committee in Pajala Municipality for the delay in enforcing an intervention pursuant to the Act on Support and Service for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments after a court referred the matter back for further processing and a new decision
Go to decision about Severe criticism of the Social Welfare Committee in Pajala Municipality for the delay in enforcing an intervention pursuant to the Act on Support and Service for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments after a court referred the matter back for further processing and a new decision
Date of decision: 2026-04-01
Decision case number: 6037-2025
Severe criticism of the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, Borås Prison, for taking coercive measures in clear contravention of the principle of proportionality
Go to decision about Severe criticism of the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, Borås Prison, for taking coercive measures in clear contravention of the principle of proportionality
Date of decision: 2026-04-01
Decision case number: 3946-2026
Criticism of the Municipal Executive Board in Sollefteå Municipality for turning over written material to only one party to a civil action in contravention of the constitutional requirement for objectivity and impartiality
Go to decision about Criticism of the Municipal Executive Board in Sollefteå Municipality for turning over written material to only one party to a civil action in contravention of the constitutional requirement for objectivity and impartiality
